Three Pillars of Digital Transformation

A while ago I wrote on Driving Towards Digital Transformation in Federal Government with a focus on background, legislative landscape, and timing. Now, I would like to circle back with a slightly different message of highlighting the three pillars on which (IMHO) the success of the Digital Transformation can be built and sustained.

First, let's rehash a couple of things - Definition (credit to i-SCOOP, well put):

Digital Transformation – is a profound transformation of business and organizational activities, processes, competencies and models to fully leverage the changes and opportunities of a mix of digital technologies and their accelerating impact in a strategic and prioritized way.

And a quick reminder that while we use Technology as a catalyst for transformation, there are other parts of equal, if not higher, importance - like People, Policy, and Process:

This leads us to a - Problem Statement:

Technology and organizations are typically govern by a different rate of change.

Martec’s Law: Technology changes exponentially, Organizations change logarithmically

Which, in turn, helps us formulate a - Solution:

Make sure that all parts of your Digital Transformation strategy (i.e. People, Process, Policy, Technology) are moving in lockstep.

Be very careful to avoid a solutionism trap when technology goes from being a catalyst, a means to an end, to becoming an end in itself. Remember that technology solutionism creates new problem without solving old ones.

This will help when addressing issues related to the uncertainty of change, the widening skill-set gap, as well as when tackling difficulties with adopting and making effective use of new technologies.

And what are the three disciplines to help us with that?

Organizational Change Management
Workforce Development
Service Adoption

And these are the Three Pillars of Digital Transformation!

Comments

Skype for Business and VTC Interoperability

Skype for Business (SfB) has a very, very strong potential, I have written about it in my previous post . I can't think of any other platform that shows as much promise in terms of bridging personal and business communications as well as unifying different modes and mediums. And all of this may have started with a strategic acquisition of Skype by Microsoft in 2011. That said, the road ahead is not without challenges. For example, interoperability with other platforms. Making SfB work with existing Video TeleConferencing (VTC) systems, many of which represent significant capital investments in organizations' infrastructure, could be of a particular importance. After reading statements like Skype for Business is based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) standards and supports H.264 (MPEG-4 video coding standard) one can come to a quick conclusion that integration and/or interoperability with other VTC solutions is easy or nearly automatic. Unfortunately, the industry is not...

WordPress displays weird characters

Sometimes after a database conversion (e.g. from MySQL to MariaDB) or due to encoding issues a situation might arise when WordPress is showing weird characters. A quick way of remedying the situation would involve examining the pages to discover a pattern (what characters are being substituted, in the example below the apostrophe was replaced by â€™ ) then running an queries against the database to reverse the effect. Here's a quick example (common tables that store content): UPDATE wp_posts SET post_content = REPLACE (post_content, 'Â' , '' ) UPDATE wp_posts SET post_content = REPLACE (post_content, 'â€™' , "'" ) UPDATE wp_postmeta SET meta_value = REPLACE (meta_value, 'Â' , '' ) UPDATE wp_postmeta SET meta_value = REPLACE (me...

IBM-Apple deal and its impact on Microsoft

IBM and Apple may seem to be the unlikeliest of partners at first, but the relationship truly is mutually beneficial – highlighting individual strengths (Apple – devices and ecosystem, IBM – enterprise capabilities and services) while avoiding competition (IBM is out of the device business, Apple is not particularly strong in the enterprise). This would not have been possible with IBM and Microsoft (both are competing in the enterprise market) or Apple and Microsoft (both are competing in mobile market). So, on the surface it appears to be a very important deal for the enterprise customers. It is also a deal that needs to be watched carefully as things develop (a somewhat similar arrangement between IBM and Palm did not generate much success). Read more on this subject here - Why the Apple-IBM deal matters How does this impact Microsoft? To a degree, though I don't think the impact is going to be very profound (something I can't say about other enterprise mobility players, ...

Technocrat

Search This Blog